Roulette, a new experimental arts and avant-garde music space located in the ground floor of the YWCA on Atlantic and Third avenues, is dealing with community concerns before its doors have even officially opened.
The Barclays Center, opening soon just a few short blocks away at Atlantic Yards, has made residents extremely cautious about what new businesses and establishments open nearby.
“Because of the coming arena there is a lot of sensitivity about the rise of commercial businesses in terms of bars and clubs,” said Howard Kolins, President of the Boerum Hill Association. “The community wants to make sure it has a large voice in terms of what gets approved and under what conditions.”
And to that end, Community Board 2 recently voted down a liquor license application for the new branch of the formerly Manhattan based not-for-profit arts venue, which is slated to open on September 15.
“I am not against alcohol,” said Eric Albert, a resident. “I am, however, against the kind of behaviors that seem to aggregate around sporting venues.”
According to Rob Perris, the District Manager of CB2, members of the board were most concerned with the legality of where in the space alcohol would be consumed. He added that the two motions to approve the liquor license application stipulated where the alcohol could be consumed, and were not approved.
Supporters of Roulette insist that the institution has no connection with the sports scene surrounding Atlantic Yards.
“I think certain people are trying to set a precedent, which I understand, but they have to look at this as an individual request,” said Karen Zebulon, board member of the Atlantic Avenue Local Development Corporation. “It’s not going to be a club, it is somebody having a glass of wine at intermission.”
Zebulon, who lives in the area and owns a business on the block, said that she and several other residents remember the “large private parties” that took place when the YWCA rented out the same space. Since Roulette plans to rent out the space as well, many fear that it will be difficult to keep these parties from getting out of hand. And while Zebulon is certain “that’s not what it’s going to be in any way,” others, including Albert, are not so sure.
“I don’t see a mechanism to control these things,” he said.
Roulette has signed a twenty year lease with the YWCA, and members of the community were glad to see a cultural institution rather than some of the other stores vying for the location, including a McDonalds.
“I think that it [Roulette] will be a great aspect of Boerum Hill,” said Kolins. “I would in no way refer to Roulette as a noisy bar or club.”
But Kolins also said the liquor license has made residents concerned with how it would be used.
Jim Staley, director of Roulette, is dedicated to working with the community to ensure that these large, out of control parties that residents are afraid of do not take place.
“We are working with the community board to make sure that there are some safe guards and restrictions to go along with what our lease has,” he said. He added that the liquor license that Roulette is applying for is “not any different from what BAM or any theaters in the area have.”
Perris confirmed that the board and Roulette are working together to “stipulate limitations that will address the community concerns.”
Roulette still hopes to obtain a liquor license, and since Community Board 2 is only advisory, they can still submit an application to the State Liquor Authority for approval.
Zebulon said Roulette is a welcome addition to the neighborhood.
“It’s beautiful what they’ve done, they’ve restored the theater,” she said. “I’m happy that they’re here.”
Michael Brown
9:13 am on Tuesday, August 9, 2011
This is so close-minded, unjust and downright illegal, it makes me sad for those who have to come in front of the Community Boards.
The only saving grace is that the Community Boards actually don't have any power, and this guy will get his license anyway,
Giacomo
11:05 am on Tuesday, August 9, 2011
Yeah...thank God Community Boards have no power. Otherwise they may have helped stand in the way of those great Brooklyn benefactors, Bloomberg & Ratners's wonderful gift to neighborhood...The Atlantic Yards Project! It would have made me so sad to see private homeowners and renters who risked their money and safety by moving into, rejuvenating and and spending the last 20 years making it a livable vibrant neighborhood which it is now, get some sort equal, legal representation from their own government.
Michael Brown
1:36 pm on Tuesday, August 9, 2011
The whole entire reason that the CB's efforts are misguided is that they latch on to issues that don't matter, as your comment does. This has nothing to do with Atlantic Yards, but somehow, they saw fit to take this stand to express their displeasure with Atlantic Yards, and in the process, threw a roadblock in the way of a business that really doesn't have anything to do with the project. And even if it did, it is time to start realizing that it is coming, like it or not.
Are we honestly expected to believe that community boards are worried about marauding bands of drunk hooligans from the basketball arena?
jill
8:43 pm on Tuesday, August 9, 2011
Michael, there will be drunk hooligans marauding from the arena. Please name any spectator sporting event that does not attract, create and dismiss the drunks when the event is over.
Roulette is a different story and an arts venue -NOT sports. If community board wants to take away any liquor licenses based upon creating beligerent drunks in the neighborhood, their energy should be devoted to the Arena not Roulette who is looking to make a couple of bucks by selling A glass of wine at intermission. With what they show and the crowd they attract, it will be A glass.
<Roulette, I am grateful you got the space and not McDonald's as the article states no matter what you choose to show as a cultural event>
As for large parties like the Y did, I cannot imagine anyone who has friends who drive (and wants to keep these friends) ever using the location for a large party once the arena is open. The traffic will be crazy and parking fees even crazier.
Mike: Please excuse my comment if yours was tongue in cheek
Laura Cromwell
3:46 pm on Tuesday, August 9, 2011
Yes, absolutely, Roulette should get it's liquor license! I have been attending concerts at Roulette (at it's various Manhattan locations) for 15 years. This is a venue dedicated to the avant-garde; experimental music and mixed-media and performance. Does that sound like a hard partying crowd to you?
brendan
9:16 pm on Tuesday, August 9, 2011
Give me a break. why don't we just ban alcohol from all of Brooklyn? who are these fools who moved to Atlantic Ave expecting no noise out drinking. seriously I wish I could vote cb2 out of the community. I live here and apparently need to attend board meetings now because they are incompetent.
Michael Brown
10:09 am on Wednesday, August 10, 2011
The point was not that there won't be drunks around sporting events, but that this establishment will not create them or encourage them, and the CB took a pointless stand as a referendum on Atlantic Yards.
Hopefully, since the arena will be well served by transit, we will see what tends to happen at Penn Station, which is just that people get on the train and go home, rather than the idiocy that is seen at the Meadowlands. Of course, if wrong-headed community groups succeed in forcing more parking at Atlantic Yards, that is EXACTLY what we will see, in addition to drunk drivers.
Giacomo
11:54 am on Wednesday, August 10, 2011
May I cut to the chase Michael and ask you if you supported the Alantic Yards project or not?
Thanks!
Michael Brown
2:54 pm on Wednesday, August 10, 2011
Whats the point? What I thought about it years ago when the decisions were being made is immaterial now, as is what anyone thought. It's happening. We need to deal with that reality, and trying to block liquor licenses is just not a productive or constructive exercise.
Giacomo
3:26 pm on Wednesday, August 10, 2011
Think you answered my question. And btw,..while I think the art space liqour license should be approved, what you are seeing with the CB trying to blocking these licenses is a reaction to those "immaterial decisions" that were forced upon us . Now that the "reality" is looming a lot of locals are realizing the scope of the damage to be done by this illegal monstrosity and if they overreact you can hardly blame them or the CB's.
Michael Brown
3:44 pm on Wednesday, August 10, 2011
Yes I can blame them. They are attempting to punish (although, with no real authority, they are just taking a stand really) someone unrelated to Ratner/NYSEDC/all the others for what they see as sins of Atlantic Yards. It is short sighted and downright petty.
For that, I can blame them.