A Message from Council Member Brad Lander
Two positive steps for the neighborhood.
As the City Council representative for Cobble Hill, Carroll Gardens and the Columbia Waterfront, I am very pleased to report that New York City recently took two good (although long term) steps towards making these neighborhoods healthier, more sustainable, and better connected.
Reducing Truck Pollution at the Port
The City Council voted recently to pass a resolution that I sponsored in support of the federal "Clean Ports Act," introduced by Congressman Jerry Nadler. The bill would empower the country's ports to implement environmental solutions for truck pollution, and improve job quality for drivers.
Earlier this month, the Council heard from area residents who want to see a strong working waterfront, but also want better air quality--and that means phasing out older, dirty trucks that spew toxins and replacing them with new, cleaner trucks. We also heard from truck drivers who would like to drive cleaner vehicles, but who are improperly classified as independent contractors (despite the fact that they make less than $29,000 per year, and don't set their own schedules or routes), so
cannot afford to buy new trucks.
The Port of Los Angeles has pursued a pioneering "clean trucks" program that classifies port truck drivers as employees of the shipping companies, and then requires those (well-capitalized) companies to upgrade to cleaner vehicles (with some financial incentives). We want to see the Port Authority of NY & NJ put a similar program in place here. But the program is stymied in court, and federal legislation is needed to enable ports to put these programs in place.
Many organizations have been working on this important issue, and I look forward to continuing to work with them, with Congressman Nadler, the Port Authority and EDC toward making our ports the greenest and most productive on the East Coast.
"Fixing the Ditch" of the BQE along Hicks Street
The "ditch" created by the BQE along Hicks Street -- bought to us by Robert Moses -- divides Carroll Gardens, Cobble Hill and the Columbia Waterfront, brings noise and exhaust into the community, is dangerous to cross, and, well, is ugly.
So for the past few months, community members have been working with the NYC
Economic Development Corporation and a consultant (funded by Congresswoman Nydia Velazquez) to envision creative solutions to make Hicks Street safer and more attractive, to reduce noise and pollution, and to create more connections across the trench.
At their final community workshop last Monday evening, and three concepts were
presented (which could be pursued individually, or together):
- Improving Hicks Street with traffic calming, new areas of open space (and possibly a cafe along one of the existing bridges), tree planting, and some noise dampening and greenery along the edge of the trench.
- Inserting a series of lightweight pedestrian and bicycle bridges at six different points across the highway to create new connections.
- Most ambitious (and expensive!), constructing a signature "green canopy" along the entire stretch, that would reduce noise and pollution, and generate solar energy.
Obviously, any of these ideas would cost a lot of money, and would take substantial
community commitment and likely quite-a-few years. But I believe that if there is enough passion and support among community residents, this can be more than a pipe dream.
Anthony
11:56 pm on Friday, December 3, 2010
Instead of paying $10M to "beautify" the BQE, how about spending that money on easing the traffic on the BQE. Let's face it, the BQE was outdated 3 years before it opened. It's a highway, it's for cars not trees or bridges over it or any of that crap. It's to get people from Point A to Point B safely and quickly. Does the BQE do that? Of course not, but heck, let's waste money in making it prettier. No one ever wanted to make the BQE greener or prettier until the yuppies moved into this neighborhood. Where was the outcry 20-years ago? Ease the traffic and maybe cars won't sit and idle for 30 minutes. Take the medians away from the BQE above Hamilton Ave. when there's no construction going on at all. BTW, building lightweight pedestrian and bicycle bridges over the BQE won't add to the noise pollution while its being built? Footnote to that Mr. Lander, bicycles is something we need less of in Carroll Gardens - but that's a discussion for another time.
Batman
8:40 am on Sunday, December 5, 2010
Anothony, your ignorance is stupefying at best, and scary at worst.
If the purpose of the $10 million investment is to get people from Point A to Point B safely and efficiently, then nothing would be a worse investment than a highway. Cars are the least efficient form of transit by any measure of time or money. Not to mention that $10 million might serve to repave a mile of the BQE, not ease any congestion. And then it would just need to be repaved again in five years.
If you want more cars, less bicycles and less innovative thinking, I've got a great place called Texas for you. If that is too far, try Nassau County.
Anthony
9:41 pm on Sunday, December 5, 2010
The BQE is not going anywhere whether you like it or not. It has been and will continue to be one of the central highways not only in NYC but Brooklyn. Therefore we need to invest in it even if you and your little clan of bicycle riders don't use it. It's apart of Brooklyn, so we might as well improve it from the inside out. If we're going to spend money on it it should be to ease the congestion so the people who use the BQE. Why improve the BQE for bike riders? That makes no sense. Beautify it? What's that going to do for the BQE? It's a highway...... A highway is for cars and truck. Repaving is an unfortunate part of having highways and streets. If it was my call I would love to fill the ditch with cement and go back to the way my dad remembers the neighborhood when Hicks St. was not divided by the BQE. But guess what, as the population has increased and the suburbs formed, highways were needed and will continue to be in operation until Kingdom Come. More people = more cars. Either embrace it or try to ignore it.
And what is the correlation between more cars less bikes = less innovation? You wan innovative, go work for Google. Also, don't try to insult me with "your ignorance is stupefying at best, and scary at worst." You don't like my opinion's then say so by all means; that's your right. But don't insult. It's my opinion. You don't like it don't read it.