patching...
Breaking: P.S. 58 on Bed Bug Alert »
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

A Big Push For Shore Power In South Brooklyn

Elected Officials and community activists rally in Red Hook

 

Earlier today on a freezing street corner in Red Hook with the Queen Mary 2 in the distance, elected officials, local residents and community leaders rallied together, armed with political power and protected by face masks. They are calling for shore power, again.

"It's time for the cruise ship terminal to stop choking Brooklyn," said State Senator Daniel Squadron."There's a simple solution, it's called shore power."

Each cruise ship that docks in the Brooklyn Cruise Terminal in Red Hook idles while it is in the port. The ships are powered by diesel fuel, a known pollutant that can cause asthma and other diseases. Connecting the ships to shore power would plug them into the cleaner energy grid that all of New York City runs on.

Shore power is a common practice in many ports around the world.

The problem is not that city agencies don't want shore power -- in fact all parties pledged support in 2009. The problem is with how long it is taking the agencies to strike a deal on maintenance and operating costs. 

Shore power requires an agreement between The New York City Economic Development Corporation (which operates the cruise terminal), the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey, the New York Power Authority, Con-Ed and Carnival Cruise Lines.

According to officials, the Port Authority and the Environmental Protection Agency have already committed $15 million for infrastructure adjustments and Carnival has committed to retrofit their ships, which costs $1 - 2 million per ship. 

The time has come to stop the delay, officials said.

"It's time to make it happen," said Squadron.

To show solidarity, elected officials from both city, state and federal government rallied for shore power today, including U.S. Representative Nydia Velazquez, State Senator Velmanette Montgomery and City Councilmembers Brad Lander and Stephen Levin.

Velazquez was quick to point out that with the new Republican controlled congress, it's not a far leap to imagine money already designated for certain projects, like shore power in Brooklyn, being taken back from those that never get off the ground.

Velazquez also said Carnival needs to realize it's going to be spending more money.

"Carnival needs to understand it's not only about the bottom line," she said. "But also what works for the community."

Cruise ships started docking in Red Hook in 2006. The neighborhood wasn't opposed to the ships docking, said Lander, adding that the surrounding neighborhoods and local residents are interested in a working Brooklyn waterfront.

But now, after two years of waiting for the conversion to shore power, residents and officials are starting to get fed up.

"It's long enough that the ships are idling, and the negotiations are idling," said Lander.

"This is an issue that affects all of Brooklyn and all of New York City," said Norman Cox, President of the Columbia Waterfront Neighborhood Association. "It's mystifying to us why such a simple and obvious thing has taken so long."

Why do you think there is a delay? Tell us in the comments.

Andrew

4:12 pm on Monday, January 3, 2011

Brooklyn Borough President Marty Markowitz wasn't there? I wonder if he supports shore power too, seeing as how he was such an advocate for the Red Hook terminal in the first place.
Also, have there been any studies done on the pollution in the neighbor? Is it higher than other parts of the community, like in Hunts Point in the Bronx?
Great story! Very interesting so many elected officials came out for this event.

Reply

Bryan

11:53 pm on Monday, January 3, 2011

I wonder how much "soft money" ConEd is putting into this?

It seems to me that they are the ones who reap the long term benefits of this plan.

The toxic emissions don't magically disappear from earth. It is merely displaced to some coal-burning power plant somewhere else (upstate New York?)

NIMBY outrage being driven by special interests.

Less than one cruise ship per week... yet no one addresses the issue of smelly diesel emissions from trucks that drive our streets daily... or the near-unbearable smells that seem to have taken permanent residence on Van Brunt St and Hamilton Ave.

Does anyone who participated in this rally actually WALK the streets of Red Hook?

I do. Past piles of dog crap and bus stops that often don't have buses stopping at them.

Seems to me those are the more pressing issues facing this community.

But solving those issues doesn't put millions into the pockets of private contractors and big business so I guess they don't matter as much.

Reply

Andrew

12:25 pm on Tuesday, January 4, 2011

Great comment, Bryan. Much better than mine.

Reply

James

1:11 pm on Tuesday, January 4, 2011

"The cause is noble, the need is great and the words spoken were forcefull. But there is one thing that needs some explanation. The members of the NYC Council present at the demonstration do not represent Red Hook. They represent Brooklyn Heights, Cobble Hill and even Park Slope. Where was the NYC Council member from Red Hook. Where was Sara [Gonzáles]? Why was she not there? Are the people who live in the Red Hook projects and the people who work in Red Hook and all who live in Red Hook less important than the people who live in Brooklyn Heights and Cobble Hill? Where was OUR NYC Council member?"

Reply

Georgia Kral

1:26 pm on Tuesday, January 4, 2011

Hi James,

I believe Councilmember Gonzalez was slated to attend the press conference. I am not sure why she didn't show up.

Reply

Leave a comment